https://groups.google.com/group/talk.religion.bahai/msg/fdaf8d71dd7f1610?hl=en&dmode=source Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: JG9 Newsgroups: talk.religion.bahai,alt.religion.bahai Subject: Re: Sold under Trade-mark Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Organization: https://groups.google.com Lines: 49 Message-ID: References: <3b938575-cc46-4a32-9ba2-bcb12dd0870e@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <4AA84438.30209@website.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.173.107.100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1252595977 9330 127.0.0.1 (10 Sep 2009 15:19:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.173.107.100; posting-account=zRpl_AkAAAAiXIRdBqKxFUkV7N1Xe3-B User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) On Sep 9, 6:11=A0pm, Mirza Ahmad Sohrab wrote: > Jeffrey, > > You're absolutely right about how bogus the trademark of the Greatest > Name is. Like most of their claims about trademarks and copyrights, it > existed for so many decades prior to some underling rubber-stamping > their meaningless application, there's nothing to worry about. It would > never hold up in a copyright court. The corrupt nsa does these things to > harass and intimidate the uninformed. And delude itself. > > Haven't your colleagues told you all this? > > Bahai regards, > > FG > > -- > Baha'i Faith & Religious Freedom of Consciencehttps://fglaysher.com/ba= haicensorship Frederick, The Wilmette NSA already has a judgment of a federal court that upholds their supposed trademark of the Greatest Name, and even says that their version of the Baha'i Faith is the only one. As outrageous as that is, that Judgment stands at least as against the Remey organization and any of its successors. As you know, the entire court action to date has revolved around the question of whether the OBF and the BPUPC are legally successors to Remey and therefore subject to that outrageous Judgment. As wrong as it is under the law, the Wilmette NSA managed to get a Judgment entered and this is very dangerous. What everyone must remember is that despite what the law of the United States stands for, if someone takes you to court and you fail to assert your rights for whatever reason (say, for example, that you don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars for lawyer's fees), a default Judgment can be entered against you and it will become binding upon you. It is certainly possible that the Wilmette NSA could sue you and others and unless you are able to fight them in court, your rights will be lost. This is dangerous and they must be stopped by all people of good will. The Wilmette NSA is an enemy of freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and they have so much money that they can throw around that they are positively dangerous. Jeffrey